Compare Mercedes-Benz CLS C219 vs Mercedes-Benz E-class W210 facelift vs Alfa Romeo 166 (936)

Mercedes-Benz CLS C219

Mercedes-Benz E-class W210 facelift

Alfa Romeo 166 (936)

Mercedes-Benz CLS C219Mercedes-Benz E-class W210 faceliftAlfa Romeo 166 (936)
Variants
CLS 320 CDI
CLS 350
CLS 500 M113
CLS 500 M273 / CLS 550
CLS 55 AMG
E 55 AMG 4MATIC
E 55 AMG
E 200 MT
E 200
E 200 CDI MT
E 200 CDI
E 200 Kompressor 163hp MT
E 200 Kompressor 163hp
E 200 Kompressor 192hp MT
E 200 Kompressor 192hp
E 220 CDI MT
E 220 CDI
E 240 2.4L MT
E 240 2.4L
E 240 2.6L MT
E 240 2.6L
E 270 CDI MT
E 270 CDI
E 280 MT
E 280 4MATIC
E 280
E 320 4MATIC
E 320
E 320 CDI
E 430 4MATIC
E 430
2.0 TS 150PS
2.0 TS 155PS
2.0 V6 205PS
2.4 JTD 136PS
2.4 JTD 140PS
2.4 JTD 150PS
2.5 V6 188PS
2.5 V6 190PS
2.5 V6 190PS AT
3.0 V6 220PS
3.0 V6 220PS AT
3.0 V6 226PS
3.0 V6 226PS AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score85%67%28%
Pros
  • The best design of all hunchback sedans
  • Solid drivetrain
  • Exceptional CLS 55 AMG
  • Good interior quality
  • No AWD nonsense
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • M113E55 in the E55 AMG
  • Robust 5G-TRONIC automatic transmission
  • Good towing capacity
  • Double-wishbone suspensions all-around
  • Rather good-looking (though worse than 156)
Cons
  • Started the 4-door coupe nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • 4MATIC started creeping in
  • RUST!
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.