Compare Mercedes CLA C117 facelift vs Skoda Superb B5 vs Skoda Rapid

Variants
CLA 45 AMG
CLA 180
CLA 180 DCT
CLA 180d
CLA 180d DCT
CLA 200
CLA 200 DCT
CLA 200d
CLA 200d 4MATIC DCT
CLA 200d DCT
CLA 220 4MATIC DCT
CLA 220d 4MATIC DCT
CLA 220d DCT
CLA 250
CLA 250 4MATIC DCT
CLA 250 DCT
1.8T
1.9 TDI 101PS
1.9 TDI 131PS
2.0
2.0 TDI 140PS
2.5
2.5 AT
2.5 TDI
2.5 TDI AT
2.8
2.8 AT
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 AT
1.2 MPI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.2 TSI 90 DSG
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 AT
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 125 AT
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.6 MPI 110
1.6 MPI 110 AT
1.6 MPI 90
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 105

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
470 L / 16.6 cu-ft
550 L / 19.4 cu-ft ~ 1490 L / 52.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.3 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Coupe
4-door Sedan
5-door Hatchback
Platform
Volkswagen B5

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
136 mm / 5.4 in
Size | Height
1432 mm / 56.4 in
1461 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
4640 mm / 182.7 in
4803 mm / 189.1 in
4483 mm / 176.5 in
Size | Width
1777 mm / 70.0 in | 2032 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
Wheelbase
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2803 mm / 110.4 in
2602 mm / 102.4 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
169 g/km

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 4
Engine | Redline
6000 rpm

Production

Availability
2016 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
22%
29%
13%
Pros
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • A cheaper way to get a B5.5 Passat
  • Lesser rear suspensions than the B5 Audi
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Small engines
  • Ugly hunchback styling
  • Build quality concerns
  • FWD platform
  • Front-end a little ugly
  • Too closely associated with taxi
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No fully independent suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.