Compare Mercedes AMG GT C190 vs Mercedes C-Class Coupe C205 facelift vs Audi S5 F5
Variants
GT
GTS
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180 MT
C 180
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 200d
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 300e 4MATIC
C 300e
C 300d 4MATIC
C 300d
C 400 4MATIC
3.0 TDI
3.0 TFSI
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
9.0 L / 9.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
58.0 L / 15.3 gal
Passengers
2
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
9.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
13.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.6 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
98 mm / 3.9 in
Size | Height
1288 mm / 50.7 in
1368 mm / 53.9 in
Size | Length
4546 mm / 179.0 in
Size | Width
1939 mm / 76.3 in
1846 mm / 72.7 in | 2029 mm / 79.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1680.0 mm / 66.1 in
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1651.0 mm / 65.0 in
1568.0 mm / 61.7 in
Wheelbase
2630 mm / 103.5 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
0.29
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1900 kg / 4189 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6
Engine
M 178 DE 40 AL
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
4.0 L / 243.0 cu-in / 3982.0 cc
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V8 engine
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Double clutch transmission (DCT)
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
87%
70%
60%
Pros
- Quick and fast
- More affordable than the SLS
- Sensuous styling
- Interesting AMG V8 lived on for the last generation
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Lots of power
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- More balanced than Mk1
Cons
- No longer stands out
- Less desirable engine
- AWD nonsense
- Mild-hybrid voodoo nonsense
- Less durable engines
- Rather ugly as a coupe (hunchback styling of fake coupe?)
- Ugly, over-styled body
- Questionable drivetrain reliability
- Too much tech nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.