Compare Mercedes SLS AMG C197 vs Mercedes E-Class Coupe C238 vs Audi S5 F5
Variants
SLS AMG
SLS AMG Black Series
SLS AMG GT
AMG E 53 4MATIC+
E 200 4MATIC
E 200
E 200 4MATIC
E 200 Euro6d
E 220d 4MATIC
E 220d
E 300
E 300 Euro6d
E 300d
E 350
E 350d
E 350d 4MATIC
E 400 4MATIC
E 400d 4MATIC
E 450 Euro6d 4MATIC
E 450 4MATIC
3.0 TDI
3.0 TFSI
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
176 L / 6.2 cu-ft
425 L / 15.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
14.0 L / 14.8 qt
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
9.5 L / 10.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
85.0 L / 22.5 gal
58.0 L / 15.3 gal
Passengers
2
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Trailing arm
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1368 mm / 53.9 in
Size | Length
4638 mm / 182.6 in
Size | Width
1846 mm / 72.7 in | 2029 mm / 79.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1568.0 mm / 61.7 in
Wheel Size
19 in, 20 in
Wheelbase
2680 mm / 105.5 in
2873 mm / 113.1 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1900 kg / 4189 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6
Engine
M 159.980
Engine | Bore
102.2 mm / 4.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.3:1
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 378.8 cu-in / 6208.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
94.6 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Double clutch transmission (DCT)
Reviews
Neofiliac score
98%
73%
60%
Pros
- Very beautiful
- Unforgettable, iconic gullwing doors
- Sensuous proportions
- Great handling
- Improve front-end styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Lots of power
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- More balanced than Mk1
Cons
- Poor rear visibility
- Questionable engine reliability
- Poor rear-end styling
- Downsized engines
- Too complex for no tangible benefits
- Ugly, over-styled body
- Questionable drivetrain reliability
- Too much tech nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.