Compare BMW 4 Series F32 Coupe vs BMW 4 Series G22 vs Audi S5 F5
Variants
418d
418d AT
420d N47
420d N47 AT
420d N47 xDrive
420d N47 xDrive AT
420d B47
420d B47 AT
420d B47 xDrive
420d B47 xDrive AT
420i
420i AT
420i xDrive
420i xDrive AT
425d N47
425d N47 AT
425d B47
425d B47 AT
428i
428i AT
428i xDrive
428i xDrive AT
430d AT
430d xDrive AT
430i
430i AT
430i xDrive AT
435d xDrive AT
435I
435i AT
435i xDrive
435i xDrive AT
440i
440i AT
440i xDrive
440i xDrive AT
420d
420d xDrive
420i
430d xDrive
430i
M440d xDrive
M440i
M440i xDrive
3.0 TDI
3.0 TFSI
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
445 L / 15.7 cu-ft
440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
59.0 L / 15.6 gal
58.0 L / 15.3 gal
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
0.5 kWh (gross)
Body Style
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1368 mm / 53.9 in
Size | Length
4638 mm / 182.6 in
Size | Width
1846 mm / 72.7 in | 2029 mm / 79.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1568.0 mm / 61.7 in
Wheelbase
2810 mm / 110.6 in
2851 mm / 112.2 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1900 kg / 4189 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6d
Euro 6
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Steptronic
Production
Made In
Germany
Reviews
Neofiliac score
71%
79%
60%
Pros
- Modern, aggressive styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Improved interior
- Good ZF 8HP automatic transmission
- Decent performance
- Torque I6 engines
- Good 0.25 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Lots of power
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- More balanced than Mk1
Cons
- Poor engine reliability
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Handling worse than its predecessors
- Questionable styling (piggy snout?)
- Reliability concerns
- Ugly, over-styled body
- Questionable drivetrain reliability
- Too much tech nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.