Compare Audi TTS 8J vs Audi TT FV facelift vs Peugeot RCZ
Variants
MT
DCT
40 TFSI
45 TFSI
45 TFSI MT
45 TFSI quattro
1.6 THP 155
1.6 THP 155 AT
1.6 THP 200
2.0 HDi 163
RCZ R
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
9.0 L / 9.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.5 L / 4.8 qt
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Payload
400 kg / 882 lbs
360 kg / 794 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
245/40 R18
225/50 R17
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 35.9 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
111 mm / 4.4 in
Size | Height
1353 mm / 53.3 in
1362 mm / 53.6 in
Size | Length
4198 mm / 165.3 in
4191 mm / 165.0 in
Size | Width
1842 mm / 72.5 in | 1952 mm / 76.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1832 mm / 72.1 in | 1966 mm / 77.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1958 mm / 77.1 in
Track Width | Front
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Wheel Size
9J x 18
8J x 17
Wheelbase
2468 mm / 97.2 in
2505 mm / 98.6 in
2612 mm / 102.8 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6d
Engine
CDLB
Engine | Bore
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.1 cu-in / 1984.0 cc
2.0 L / 121.1 cu-in / 1984.0 cc
Engine | Power
272.0 hp / 202.8 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
137.1 hp/L / 2.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Production
Availability
2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
63%
49%
37%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Relatively quick and fast
- More muscular styling
- Adequate performance
- Small turning circle
- Unforgettable styling
- Interesting RCZ R
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.