Compare Audi R8 42 vs Nissan GT-R R35 vs Nissan 200SX S14
Variants
4.2 FSI 420
4.2 FSI 420 AMT
4.2 FSI 430
4.2 FSI 430 AMT
5.2 FSI 525
5.2 FSI 525 AMT
GT AMT
2008
2011
2013
2017
Nismo
Track Edition
MT
AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
307 L / 10.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
25.0 L / 26.4 qt
11.3 L / 11.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Payload
300 kg / 661 lbs
430 kg / 948 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
105 mm / 4.1 in
Size | Height
1252 mm / 49.3 in
1370 mm / 53.9 in
1295 mm / 51.0 in
Size | Length
4560 mm / 179.5 in
Size | Width
1895 mm / 74.6 in
1730 mm / 68.1 in
Track Width | Front
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
Weight
1350.0 kg / 2976.2 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2780 mm / 109.4 in
2525 mm / 99.4 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.5 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.1 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26
Fuel Economy
8.8 L/100km / 26.7 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
235.0 km/h / 146.0 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine
VR38DETT
Engine | Bore
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
9.0:1
8.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.8 L / 231.8 cu-in / 3799.0 cc
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
200.0 hp / 149.1 kW @ 6400 rpm
Engine | Redline
7100 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
100.1 hp/L / 1.6 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
88.4 mm / 3.5 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
265 Nm / 195.5 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
DCT
Production
Availability
1993 ~ 2000
Reviews
Neofiliac score
86%
92%
74%
Pros
- Wonderful dry sump engines
- Good handling characteristics
- Manual transmission
- Exceptional sprint time
- Great performance overall
- Superb handling characteristics
- Up to enjoyable 7100rpm redline
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Superb drivetrain reliability
- Exceptional styling
- Wonderful handling characteristics
Cons
- AWD-only
- Automated manual transmission
- Awkward styling from some angles
- Low cargo capacity
- No powerful engine options
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.