Compare Honda CR-Z vs Toyota Auris 2 vs Honda Civic 11 Hatchback
Variants
1.2
1.2 CVT
1.33
1.33 Euro6
1.4 D-4D 90 Euro6
1.4 D-4D 90
1.4 D-4D 90 AT
1.6 D-4D 112
1.6
1.6 CVT
Hybrid Euro6
Hybrid
2.0 D-4D
1.5 VTEC
1.5 VTEC CVT
2.0 VTEC
2.0 VTEC CVT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
225 L / 7.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
4
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Tire Size
195/55 R16
Turning Circle
12.6 m / 41.3 ft
Construction
Body Style
3-door Coupe
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1395 mm / 54.9 in
1415 mm / 55.7 in
Size | Length
4078 mm / 160.6 in
4549 mm / 179.1 in
Size | Width
2013 mm / 79.3 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1801 mm / 70.9 in
Track Width | Front
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
Weight
1147.0 kg / 2528.7 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2435 mm / 95.9 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2736 mm / 107.7 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.4 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
5.0 L/100km / 47.0 MPG (combined) | 6.1 L/100km / 38.6 MPG (urban) | 4.4 L/100km / 53.5 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.4:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 91.4 cu-in / 1497.0 cc
Engine | Power
114.0 hp / 85.0 kW @ 6100 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
76.2 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
145 Nm / 106.9 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2010 ~ 2016
2021
Reviews
Neofiliac score
35%
27%
61%
Pros
- Great styling
- Punchy petrol engine
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Improved exterior styling
- Sweet manual transmission
- Characterful VTEC engine lived on
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- CVT
- Basic hybrid setup
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- CVT
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.