Compare Nissan 200SX S14 vs Renault Laguna Coupe vs Peugeot 407 Coupe
Variants
MT
AT
2.0 Turbo 170 AT
2.0 Turbo 205
2.0 dCi 150
2.0 dCi 150 AT
2.0 dCi 173
2.0 dCi 178
3.0 dCi AT
3.5 AT
2.2
2.7 HDi
3.0
3.0 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
307 L / 10.8 cu-ft
423 L / 14.9 cu-ft
400 L / 14.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
67.0 L / 17.7 gal
Passengers
4
4
5
Payload
430 kg / 948 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1295 mm / 51.0 in
1399 mm / 55.1 in
Size | Length
4560 mm / 179.5 in
4643 mm / 182.8 in
4815 mm / 189.6 in
Size | Width
1730 mm / 68.1 in
1868 mm / 73.5 in
Track Width | Front
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
1548.0 mm / 60.9 in
1579.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Weight
1350.0 kg / 2976.2 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
18 in
Wheelbase
2525 mm / 99.4 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.5 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.1 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Fuel Economy
8.8 L/100km / 26.7 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
235.0 km/h / 146.0 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
8.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
200.0 hp / 149.1 kW @ 6400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
100.1 hp/L / 1.6 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
265 Nm / 195.5 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Production
Availability
1993 ~ 2000
2005 ~ 2008
Reviews
Neofiliac score
74%
24%
34%
Pros
- Superb drivetrain reliability
- Exceptional styling
- Wonderful handling characteristics
- Decent engine reliability
- Elegant styling
- Better interior than the 407 sedan
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Low cargo capacity
- No independent rear suspensions
- Awkward styling
- Poor build quality
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front and semi-independent suspensions in the rear
- Questionable reliability
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.