Compare Lotus Exige 2 vs Lotus Evora vs Nissan 370Z

Variants
Exige
Exige S
Evora
Evora S
Evora S AT
Evora 400
Evora 400 AT
Evora Sport 410
Evora Sport 410 AT
Evora GT
Evora GT AT
Evora GT430 Sport
Evora GT430 Sport AT
370Z
370Z 2018
370Z AT
370Z AT 2018
370Z NISMO
370Z NISMO AT
370Z NISMO EU

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
115 L / 4.1 cu-ft
160 L / 5.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
12.0 L / 12.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.4 L / 4.6 qt
4.9 L / 5.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
2
2
Payload
400 kg / 882 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
11.5 deg
11.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.0 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
195/50 R16, 225/45 R17
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
115 mm / 4.5 in
Track Width | Front
1454.0 mm / 57.2 in
1564.0 mm / 61.6 in
Wheel Size
7J x 16, 8.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2300 mm / 90.6 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
208 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Fuel Economy
8.8 L/100km / 26.7 MPG (combined) | 12.0 L/100km / 19.6 MPG (urban) | 6.8 L/100km / 34.6 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Mid-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 5
Engine
2ZZ-GE
VQ37VHR
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.6 cu-in / 1796.0 cc
3.5 L / 210.9 cu-in / 3456.0 cc
Engine | Redline
7500 rpm
Engine | Stroke
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Reviews

Neofiliac score
78%
85%
81%
Pros
  • Improved engine output
  • Better transmission
  • Very light
  • Great handling
  • Great performance
  • Superb handling characteristics
  • Good handling characteristics
  • Up to enjoyable 7500rpm redline
  • Some reliability concerns
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Very little cargo space
  • Very little cargo space
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.