Compare Ford GT vs Chrysler Crossfire vs Mini Coupe
Variants
558 PS
3.2 MT
3.2 AT
SRT-6
Cooper
Cooper AT
Cooper S
Cooper S AT
Cooper SD
Cooper SD AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
46 L / 1.6 cu-ft
215 L / 7.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.2 L / 11.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
2
2
2
Payload
290 kg / 639 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-Wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-Wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/45 ZR18, 315/40 ZR19
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
139 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1125 mm / 44.3 in
1296 mm / 51.0 in
Size | Length
4645 mm / 182.9 in
4058 mm / 159.8 in
Size | Width
1955 mm / 77.0 in
1683 mm / 66.3 in
Track Width | Front
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
1493.0 mm / 58.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1620.0 mm / 63.8 in
1502.0 mm / 59.1 in
Wheel Size
9J z 18, 11.5J x 19
Wheelbase
2710 mm / 106.7 in
2400 mm / 94.5 in
2467 mm / 97.1 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Mid-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5
Engine
M112 E32
Engine | Bore
90.2 mm / 3.6 in
89.9 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
8.4:1
Engine | Displacement
5.4 L / 330.1 cu-in / 5409.0 cc
3.2 L / 195.2 cu-in / 3199.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
105.8 mm / 4.2 in
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Supercharged multi-port injected petrol V8 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2011 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
78%
79%
39%
Pros
- Great retro styling
- Good drivetrain
- Iconic rear styling
- Reliable drivetrain
- Double-wishbone + multi-linke suspension setup
- Available with manual transmission
- Quirky, unique styling
Cons
- Very little cargo space
- Rather uncomfortable
- Mediocre performance
- Perhaps too compact
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.