Compare SETA Ibiza 4 SportsCoupe vs Peugeot 208 vs Peugeot 308

SETA Ibiza 4 SportsCoupe 3-door Hatchback (2008-2017)

SEAT | Cars

Peugeot | Cars

Variants

1.0 75

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 110 DSG

1.0 TSI 95

1.2 60

1.2 70

1.2 70 Euro5

1.2 TDI 75

1.2 TSI 105

1.2 TSI 105 DSG

1.2 TSI 85

1.2 TSI 90

1.4 85

1.4 85 Euro5

1.4 TDI 105

1.4 TDI 75

1.4 TDI 80

1.4 TDI 90

1.4 TDI 90 DSG

1.4 TFSI 180 Cupra

1.4 TSI 140

1.4 TSI 150

1.4 TSI 150 DSG FR

1.4 TSI 180 DSG Cupra

1.6 105

1.6 105 DSG

1.6 81

1.6 TDI 105

1.6 TDI 90

1.6 TDI 90 DSG

1.8 TSI 192 Cupra

1.9 TDI 105

1.9 TDI 90

2.0 TDI 143

2.0 TDI 143 FR

1.0 PureTech

1.0 PureTech 2016+

1.0 VTi

1.2 PureTech 110

1.2 PureTech 110 AT

1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d

1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d AT

1.2 PureTech 82

1.2 PureTech 82 AT

1.2 PureTech 82 Euro6d

1.2 VTi 82

1.4 e-HDi

1.4 HDi

1.4 VTi 95

1.5 BlueHDi 102

1.6 BlueHDi 100

1.6 BlueHDi 120

1.6 BlueHDi 75

1.6 e-HDi 115

1.6 e-HDi 92 5MT

1.6 e-HDi 92 6MT

1.6 THP 155

1.6 THP 208

1.6 VTi 120

GTi 200

GTi 208

1.4 VTi 95

1.4 VTi 98

1.6 e-HDi 112

1.6 e-HDi 115

1.6 HDi 109

1.6 HDi 90

1.6 HDi 92

1.6 THP 150

1.6 THP 150 AT

1.6 THP 156

1.6 THP 156 AT

1.6 THP 175

1.6 VTi 120

1.6 VTi 120 AT

2.0 HDi 136

2.0 HDi 136 AT

2.0 HDi 150

2.0 HDi 163 AT

GTi 200

Capacity

Fuel Capacity

45.0 L / 11.9 gal

50.0 L / 13.2 gal

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Turning Circle

10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Dimensions

Size | Height

1498 mm / 59.0 in

Size | Length

4276 mm / 168.3 in

Size | Width

1693 mm / 66.7 in

Track Width | Front

1526.0 mm / 60.1 in

Track Width | Rear

1521.0 mm / 59.9 in

Wheelbase

2469 mm / 97.2 in

2538 mm / 99.9 in

2608 mm / 102.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.28

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Redline

5000 rpm

Reviews

Neofiliac score

17%

13%

18%

Pros

Low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption

Cons

Basic suspension setup
Somewhat ugly
Only available with small engines

No powerful engine options
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.