Compare SETA Ibiza 4 SportsCoupe vs Peugeot 207 vs Peugeot 308
Variants
1.0 75
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 70 Euro5
1.2 70 Euro5
1.2 TDI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 85
1.4 85 Euro5
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 75
1.4 TDI 80
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TFSI 180 Cupra
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG FR
1.4 TSI 180 DSG Cupra
1.6 105
1.6 105 DSG
1.6 81
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.8 TSI 192 Cupra
1.9 TDI 105
1.9 TDI 90
2.0 TDI 143
2.0 TDI 143 FR
1.4 73
1.4 75
1.4 90
1.4 90 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 95 Euro5
1.6 110
1.6 120
1.6 120 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
RC
RC Euro5
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 98
1.6 e-HDi 112
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 HDi 109
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 150 AT
1.6 THP 156
1.6 THP 156 AT
1.6 THP 175
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
2.0 HDi 136
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 163 AT
GTi 200
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
Dimensions
Size | Height
1472 mm / 58.0 in
1498 mm / 59.0 in
Size | Length
4276 mm / 168.3 in
Size | Width
1693 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1526.0 mm / 60.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1521.0 mm / 59.9 in
Wheelbase
2469 mm / 97.2 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2608 mm / 102.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
0.28
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Redline
5000 rpm
Reviews
Neofiliac score
17%
8%
18%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Small turning circle
- Low fuel consumption
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Basic suspension setup
- Somewhat ugly
- Only available with small engines
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small, unreliable engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Unreliable transmissions
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.