Compare Cadillac XLR vs Ford Mustang 5 Convertible vs Ford Focus CC
Variants
XLR
XLR-V
Mustang
Mustang GT 304
Mustang GT 324
Mustang GT 324 AT
Mustang GT 500 507
Mustang GT 500 558
Mustang GT 500 672
1.6 Duratec
2.0 Duratec AT
2.0 TDCi
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
125 L / 4.4 cu-ft ~ 328 L / 11.6 cu-ft
275 L / 9.7 cu-ft
238 L / 8.4 cu-ft ~ 534 L / 18.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
12.0 L / 12.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Solid axle
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55R16
Turning Circle
11.3 m / 37.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1279 mm / 50.4 in
1456 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
4513 mm / 177.7 in
4509 mm / 177.5 in
Size | Width
1836 mm / 72.3 in
1877 mm / 73.9 in
1834 mm / 72.2 in
Wheel Size
8J X 18
Wheelbase
2685 mm / 105.7 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
11.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
11.3 sec
CO2 Emission
291 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Fuel Economy
8.3 L/100km / 28.3 MPG (combined) | 11.8 L/100km / 19.9 MPG (urban) | 6.3 L/100km / 37.3 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
198.0 km/h / 123.0 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 122.0 cu-in / 1999.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
72.5 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
83.1 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
190 Nm / 140.1 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
89%
73%
25%
Pros
- Wonderful styling
- Hardtop convertible
- As well built as any modern Cadillac
- Rear-mounted transmission
- Great V8 choices
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Improved sporty styling
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Hardtop convertible
Cons
- Low cargo capacity
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Basic suspension setup
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- Awkward styling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.