Compare Toyota RAV4 III (XA30) vs Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50) vs Toyota C-HR facelift

Toyota RAV4 III (XA30)

Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)

Toyota C-HR facelift

Toyota RAV4 III (XA30)Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)Toyota C-HR facelift
Variants
2.0 152 4WD
2.0 152 AWD AT
2.0 158
2.0 158 AWD
2.0 158 Euro5
2.0 158 Euro5 AWD
2.0 158 Euro5 AWD CVT
2.2D 136 AWD
2.2D 150
2.2D 150 AWD
2.2D 150 AWD AT
2.2D 177 AWD
1.2
1.2 4WD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 AT
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid

Reviews

Neofiliac score41%28%42%
Pros
  • High level of reliability
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption (hybrid)
  • Small turning circle
  • Good engine reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Just a clumsy hatchback
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Impractical

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.