Compare Range Rover vs Range Rover L460 vs Volvo XC90 II
Variants
3.0 SDV6 250
3.0 SDV6 250 LWB
3.0 SDV6 275
3.0 SDV6 275 LWB
3.0 SDV6 Hybrid
3.0 Supercharged 340
3.0 Supercharged 340 LWB
3.0 Supercharged 380
3.0 Supercharged 380 LWB
3.0 TDV6
3.0 TDV6 Euro6
3.0 TDV6 Euro6 LWB
4.4 SDV8
4.4 SDV8 Euro6 LWB
4.4 SDV8 Euro6 LWB
4.4 SDV8 Euro6d
4.4 SDV8 Euro6d LWB
5.0
5.0 Euro5
5.0 Supercharged 510 LWB
5.0 Supercharged 525
5.0 Supercharged 525 LWB
5.0 Supercharged SVAutobiography
5.0 Supercharged SVAutobiography LWB
D250
D300
D300 LWB
D350
D350 LWB
P360
P360 LWB
P400
P400 LWB
P400e
P400e LWB
D250
D300
D350
D350 L
D350 L 7 Seat
D350 L SVAutobiography
D350 SVAutobiography
P360
P360 L
P360 L 7 Seat
P400
P400 L
P400 L 7 Seat
P440e
P440e L
P510e
P510e SVAutobiography
P530
P530 L
P530 L 7 Seat
P530 L SVAutobiography
P530 SVAutobiography
D4 AT
D4 AWD AT
D5 AWD AT
D5 Euro6d AWD AT
T5 Euro6d AWD AT
T5 AWD AT
T6 Euro6d AWD AT
T6 AWD AT
T8 Euro6d AWD AT
T8 AWD AT
Capacity
Passengers
5
Payload
672 kg / 1482 lbs
Chassis
Offroad | Approach Angle
23.8 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
21.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
29.0 deg
23.3 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Water Fording
900 mm / 35.4 in
900 mm / 35.4 in
450 mm / 17.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
38.2 kWh (gross) | 31.8 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Dimensions
Size | Height
1870 mm / 73.6 in
1776 mm / 69.9 in
Size | Length
4950 mm / 194.9 in
Size | Width
2209 mm / 87.0 in (mirror unfolded) | 2047 mm / 80.6 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1702.0 mm / 67.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1704.0 mm / 67.1 in
Wheel Size
19 in, 20 in, 21 in, 22 in
Wheelbase
2984 mm / 117.5 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
36.0 m / 118.1 ft
Electric Range
113.0 km / 70.2 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d Final
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
86%
88%
70%
Pros
- Interesting engine choices
- Great comfort
- Superb offroad capabilities
- Low official fuel consumption available
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Excellent styling
- Good performance
- Superb offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Comfortable
- Some offroad capabilities
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Down to very low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Horribly unreliable, a reputation well earned and well kept
- Reliability concerns
- PHEV nonsense
- Only available with small engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.