Compare Range Rover L322 vs Range Rover Sport L494 vs Land Rover Discovery 3
Variants
3.0 TD6
3.6 TDV8
4.2 V8 Supercharged
4.4 V8 299
4.4 V8 306
4.4 TDV8
4.4 V8 286
5.0 V8
5.0 V8 Supercharged Euro5
5.0 V8 Supercharged
P300
P300 7 seat
SD4
SD4 7 seat
Si4
Si4 7 seat
D250
D250 7 seat
D300
D300 7 seat
D350
P360
P360 7 seat
P400
P400 7 seat
SDV6 Euro6b
SDV6 Euro6
SDV6 Euro6 7 seat
TDV6
SDV6
V6 Supercharged Euro6
V6 Supercharged
V6 Supercharged Euro6 7 seat
SDV8 Euro6
SDV8
V8 Supercharged
V8 Supercharged Euro6
V8 Supercharged Euro6 7 seat
P400e
SVR
SVR Euro6
2.7 TDI
2.7 TDI AT
4.4
Capacity
Passengers
5
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
29.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
25.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
24.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
275/45 R21 110Y, 295/40 R22
255/55 R19
Turning Circle
12.6 m / 41.3 ft
Water Fording
700 mm / 27.6 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.1 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
225 mm / 8.9 in
Size | Height
1887 mm / 74.3 in
Size | Length
4835 mm / 190.4 in
Size | Width
2009 mm / 79.1 in
Track Width | Front
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
1686.0 mm / 66.4 in
1613.0 mm / 63.5 in
Wheel Size
19 in
Wheelbase
2880 mm / 113.4 in
2923 mm / 115.1 in
2885 mm / 113.6 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2004 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
83%
76%
64%
Pros
- Continually improved drivetrain
- Superb offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Powerful engines on option
- Good offroad capabilities
- Good towing capacity
- Good offroad capabilities
- Classic styling
- Good fit and finish
Cons
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Many reliability issues with the drivetrain
- Horrible electrical problems
- Serious reliability concerns
- LR's own copy of RR
- Slow and sluggish
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.