Compare Land Rover Range Rover Sport (L320) vs Porsche Cayenne 3 (9Y0) vs Volvo XC90 II

Land Rover Range Rover Sport (L320)

Porsche Cayenne 3 (9Y0)

Volvo XC90 II

Land Rover Range Rover Sport (L320)Porsche Cayenne 3 (9Y0)Volvo XC90 II
Variants
2.7 TDV6
3.0 TDV6 211
3.0 TDV6 245
3.0 TDV6 256
3.6 TDV8 Euro5
3.6 TDV8
4.2 V8 Supercharged
4.4 V8
5.0 V8
5.0 V8 Supercharged
Cayenne
Cayenne E-Hybrid
Cayenne E-Hybrid Euro6d
Cayenne GTS
Cayenne S
Cayenne Turbo
Cayenne Turbo S E-Hybrid
Cayenne Turbo S E-Hybrid Euro6d
D4 AT
D4 AWD AT
D5 AWD AT
D5 Euro6d AWD AT
T5 Euro6d AWD AT
T5 AWD AT
T6 Euro6d AWD AT
T6 AWD AT
T8 Euro6d AWD AT
T8 AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score78%89%70%
Pros
  • Interesting, though not the most reliable, engine lineup
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Superb performance
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low official 2.4L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good handling
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • High 0.37 drag coefficient
  • Electrical problems
  • Bland styling
  • Obnoxious noise
  • Only available with small engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.