Compare Land Rover Discovery 4 vs Range Rover vs Volvo XC90 II
Variants
2.7 TDV6
2.7 TDV6 AT
3.0 SDV6 AT
3.0 TDV6 8AT
3.0 TDV6 6AT
3.0 SCV6 AT
4.0 V6 AT
5.0 V8 AT
3.0 SDV6 250
3.0 SDV6 250 LWB
3.0 SDV6 275
3.0 SDV6 275 LWB
3.0 SDV6 Hybrid
3.0 Supercharged 340
3.0 Supercharged 340 LWB
3.0 Supercharged 380
3.0 Supercharged 380 LWB
3.0 TDV6
3.0 TDV6 Euro6
3.0 TDV6 Euro6 LWB
4.4 SDV8
4.4 SDV8 Euro6 LWB
4.4 SDV8 Euro6 LWB
4.4 SDV8 Euro6d
4.4 SDV8 Euro6d LWB
5.0
5.0 Euro5
5.0 Supercharged 510 LWB
5.0 Supercharged 525
5.0 Supercharged 525 LWB
5.0 Supercharged SVAutobiography
5.0 Supercharged SVAutobiography LWB
D250
D300
D300 LWB
D350
D350 LWB
P360
P360 LWB
P400
P400 LWB
P400e
P400e LWB
D4 AT
D4 AWD AT
D5 AWD AT
D5 Euro6d AWD AT
T5 Euro6d AWD AT
T5 AWD AT
T6 Euro6d AWD AT
T6 AWD AT
T8 Euro6d AWD AT
T8 AWD AT
Capacity
Passengers
5
Payload
672 kg / 1482 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
36.2 deg
23.8 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
21.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
29.6 deg
23.3 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
900 mm / 35.4 in
450 mm / 17.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Size | Height
1887 mm / 74.3 in
1776 mm / 69.9 in
Size | Length
4829 mm / 190.1 in
4950 mm / 194.9 in
Track Width | Front
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1613.0 mm / 63.5 in
Wheel Size
19 in, 20 in, 21 in, 22 in
Wheelbase
2885 mm / 113.6 in
2984 mm / 117.5 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
36.0 m / 118.1 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.40
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
76%
86%
70%
Pros
- Improved exterior and interior
- Superb offroad capabilities
- Strong drivetrain lineup
- Interesting engine choices
- Great comfort
- Superb offroad capabilities
- Low official fuel consumption available
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Some offroad capabilities
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Down to very low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- High 0.40 drag coefficient
- Electrical problems
- Horribly unreliable, a reputation well earned and well kept
- Only available with small engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.