Compare Land Rover Freelander 2 (L359) vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551) vs Toyota C-HR facelift

Land Rover Freelander 2 (L359)

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)

Toyota C-HR facelift

Land Rover Freelander 2 (L359)Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)Toyota C-HR facelift
Variants
2.0 GTDi AWD AT
2.2 eD4
2.2 SD4 AWD AT
2.2 TD4 150 AWD
2.2 TD4 150 AWD AT
2.2 TD4 160
2.2 TD4 160 AT
3.2
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid

Reviews

Neofiliac score21%27%42%
Pros
  • Decent drivetrain reliability (rare for an LR)
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good engine reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Rather ugly
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Impractical

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.