Compare Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253 vs Mercedes-Benz GLC X253 facelift vs Jaguar E-Pace facelift

Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253

Mercedes-Benz GLC X253 facelift

Jaguar E-Pace facelift

Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253Mercedes-Benz GLC X253 faceliftJaguar E-Pace facelift
Variants
GLC 43 AMG 4MATIC AT
GLC 63 AMG 4MATIC+ MCT
GLC 63 AMG S 4MATIC+ MCT
F-CELL 4MATIC
GLC 220d 4MATIC AT
GLC 250 4MATIC AT
GLC 250d 4MATIC AT
GLC 300 4MATIC AT
GLC 350d 4MATIC AT
GLC 350e 4MATIC AT
AMG GLC 43 4MATIC
AMG GLC 63 4MATIC+
AMG GLC 63 S 4MATIC+
GLC 200 4MATIC
GLC 200d 4MATIC
GLC 220d 4MATIC
GLC 300 4MATIC
GLC 300d 4MATIC
GLC 300de 4MATIC
GLC 300e 4MATIC
GLC 400d 4MATIC
P160
P300e AWD
D165 MT
D165 AWD
D200 AWD
P200 AWD
P250 AWD
P300 AWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score60%72%35%
Pros
  • Great V8 in the 63AMG models
  • Cleaner exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good performance
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good interior styling
  • Good towing capacity
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Most engines are lethargic
  • Fuel-cell not widely available
  • Crossover nonsense
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low build quality

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.