Compare Mercedes GLC-Class X253 vs Hyundai Santa Fe 2 vs Hyundai Nexo
Variants
GLC 43 AMG 4MATIC AT
GLC 63 AMG 4MATIC+ MCT
GLC 63 AMG S 4MATIC+ MCT
F-CELL 4MATIC
GLC 220d 4MATIC AT
GLC 250 4MATIC AT
GLC 250d 4MATIC AT
GLC 300 4MATIC AT
GLC 350d 4MATIC AT
GLC 350e 4MATIC AT
2.2 CRDi
2.2 CRDi AWD AT
2.2 CRDi AWD
2.7
2.7 AWD
2.7 AWD AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft ~ 1466 L / 51.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
451 kg / 994 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
19.9 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.1 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
16.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/65 R17
225/60 R17, 245/45 R19
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.5 kWh (gross)
1.6 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door hydrogen fuel cell SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
123 mm / 4.8 in
162 mm / 6.4 in
Size | Height
1725 mm / 67.9 in
1630 mm / 64.2 in
Size | Length
4650 mm / 183.1 in
4670 mm / 183.9 in
Size | Width
1890 mm / 74.4 in
1860 mm / 73.2 in
Track Width | Front
1615.0 mm / 63.6 in
1614.0 mm / 63.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1620.0 mm / 63.8 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Weight
1889.0 kg / 4164.5 lbs
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17, 7.5J x 19
Wheelbase
2873 mm / 113.1 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2790 mm / 109.8 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.7 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
0.32
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
177.0 km/h / 110.0 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 3
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Power
163 hp / 121.5 kW
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Type
hydrogen engine
Transmission | Type
CVT
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2013
2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
60%
34%
43%
Pros
- Great V8 in the 63AMG models
- Cleaner exterior styling
- Low official fuel consumption
- High cargo capacity
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Powered by zero-emission hydrogen fuel cell
Cons
- Most engines are lethargic
- Fuel-cell not widely available
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Poor performance
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.