Compare Mercedes-Benz ML-Class W164 vs Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class W166 vs Mercedes-Benz GLA H247

Mercedes-Benz ML-Class W164

Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class W166

Mercedes-Benz GLA H247

Mercedes-Benz ML-Class W164Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class W166Mercedes-Benz GLA H247
Variants
ML 63 AMG
ML 280 CDI
ML 320 CDI
ML 350
ML 420 CDI
ML 500 M113
ML 500 M273 / ML 550
GLE 450 AMG
GLE 63 AMG S
GLE 63 AMG
GLE 250d
GLE 350d
GLE 400
GLE 500 e
GLE 500
AMG GLA 35 4MATIC
AMG GLA 45 4MATIC+
AMG GLA 45 S 4MATIC+
GLA 180
GLA 180d
GLA 200
GLA 200 4MATIC
GLA 200d
GLA 200d 4MATIC
GLA 220d
GLA 220d 4MATIC
GLA 250
GLA 250 4MATIC
GLA 250e

Reviews

Neofiliac score71%78%32%
Pros
  • Interesting engine lineup
  • Much improved exterior design
  • Good handling
  • Good power and handling in the GLE63
  • Low official fuel consumption in the PHEV
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent interior quality
Cons
  • Poor offroad capabilities
  • Poor reliability record
  • Hybrid nonsense
  • More bland in styling
  • Too many gears in the 9G-Tronic
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.