Compare Kia Sorento 2 vs Renault Kadjar vs Renault Koleos 2
Variants
2.0 CRDi AWD
2.2 CRDi AWD
2.2 CRDi AWD AT
2.4 174 AWD AT
2.4 174 AWD
2.4 140 AWD AT
2.4 192 AWD
2.4 192 AWD AT
3.5 AWD AT
3.5 AT
1.2 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 130 AWD
1.6 dCi
1.6 dCi CVT
2.0 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi 4x4
2.0 dCi 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi CVT
2.5 4x4 CVT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
409 L / 14.4 cu-ft ~ 1478 L / 52.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.6 L / 9.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
28.0 deg
18.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
23.0 deg
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.2 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
191 mm / 7.5 in
200 mm / 7.9 in
210 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1607 mm / 63.3 in
1673 mm / 65.9 in
Size | Length
4449 mm / 175.2 in
Size | Width
1885 mm / 74.2 in
1836 mm / 72.3 in | 2058 mm / 81.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1843 mm / 72.6 in | 2063 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1864 mm / 73.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1591.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1621.0 mm / 63.8 in
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2646 mm / 104.2 in
2705 mm / 106.5 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
0.353
Towing Capacity
1588 kg / 3501 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6
Engine
Lambda II G6DC
Engine | Bore
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
80.0 mm / 3.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Engine | Stroke
87.0 mm / 3.4 in
79.5 mm / 3.1 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
6-speed
Production
Availability
2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
35%
4%
28%
Pros
- Improved styling
- High cargo capacity
- Basic offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Coherent exterior design
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- No longer an SUV
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- CMiserably low engine output
- Poor build quality
- Horrible styling
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.