Compare Kia Niro vs Volvo XC60 II (SPA) vs Kia Sportage 5 (NQ5)

Kia Niro

Volvo XC60 II (SPA)

Kia Sportage 5 (NQ5)

Kia NiroVolvo XC60 II (SPA)Kia Sportage 5 (NQ5)
Variants
1.6 GDI Hybrid
1.6 GDI Euro6d Hybrid
1.6 GDI PHEV
1.6 GDI Euro6d PHEV
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
1.6 CRDi 116 MT
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 150 AWD DCT
1.6 T-GDi 150 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 150 MT
1.6 T-GDi 180 AWD DCT
1.6 T-GDi 180 DCT
1.6 T-GDi Hybrid
1.6 T-GDi Hybrid AWD
1.6 T-GDi PHEV AWD
2.0 CRDi AT
2.0 CRDi AWD AT
2.0 MPI AT
2.0 MPI MT
2.5 GDI AT
2.5 GDI AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score38%57%32%
Pros
  • Good exterior styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Decent interior
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Ugly
  • Crossover nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.