Compare Kia Niro vs Audi Q3 Sportback F3 vs Kia Sportage 5

Kia | Cars

Audi | Cars

Kia | Cars

Variants

1.6 GDI Hybrid

1.6 GDI Euro6d Hybrid

1.6 GDI PHEV

1.6 GDI Euro6d PHEV

35 TDI DCT

35 TDI quattro

35 TDI quattro DCT

35 TFSI

35 TFSI DCT

40 TDI 190 quattro DCT

40 TDI 200 quattro DCT

45 TFSI 230 quattro DCT

45 TFSI 245 quattro DCT

45 TFSI e DCT

1.6 CRDi 116 MT

1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT

1.6 CRDi 136 DCT

1.6 T-GDi 150 AWD DCT

1.6 T-GDi 150 DCT

1.6 T-GDi 150 MT

1.6 T-GDi 180 AWD DCT

1.6 T-GDi 180 DCT

1.6 T-GDi Hybrid

1.6 T-GDi Hybrid AWD

1.6 T-GDi PHEV AWD

2.0 CRDi AT

2.0 CRDi AWD AT

2.0 MPI AT

2.0 MPI MT

2.5 GDI AT

2.5 GDI AWD AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity

6.0 L / 6.3 qt

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Chassis Type

Unibody

Offroad | Approach Angle

20.4 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

17.7 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Double-wishbone

Multi-link

Turning Circle

10.6 m / 34.8 ft

11.8 m / 38.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

13.0 kWh (gross)

Battery | Type

Lithium-polymer

Lithium-ion

Lithium-polymer

Battery | Voltage

360.0 V

Body Style

Compact crossover

Platform

Hyundai-Kia N3

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

160 mm / 6.3 in

Size | Length

4355 mm / 171.5 in

Track Width | Front

1615.0 mm / 63.6 in

Wheelbase

2700 mm / 106.3 in

2680 mm / 105.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.29

Electric Range

58.0 km / 36.0 mi

61.0 km / 37.9 mi

56.0 km / 34.8 mi

Towing Capacity

600 kg / 1323 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine

G4LE

G4KIII

Engine | Bore

72.0 mm / 2.8 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

13.0:1

Engine | Stroke

97.0 mm / 3.8 in

Engine | Torque

147 Nm / 108.4 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm + 170 Nm / 125.4 lb-ft @ 0-1798 rpm

Transmission | Gears

6-speed

Transmission | Type

Double clutch transmission (DCT)

Production

Debut

2018-07-25

2021-06-08

Made In

Hungary, China

South Korea

Reviews

Neofiliac score

38%

32%

Pros

Good exterior styling
Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Low official fuel consumption

Low fuel consumption
Good marketing

Decent interior
High cargo capacity

Cons

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output

Impractical and ugly
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Poor performance
No powerful engine options
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Ugly
Crossover nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.