Compare Ford Expedition 2 vs Ford Expedition MAX 6 vs Nissan Armada

Variants
4.6
4.6 4WD
5.4 263 4WD
5.4 263
5.4 304
5.4 304 4WD
4WD
RWD
5.6 317 4WD
5.6 317
5.6 305
5.6 309 4WD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
571 L / 20.2 cu-ft ~ 1723 L / 60.8 cu-ft
971 L / 34.3 cu-ft ~ 3440 L / 121.5 cu-ft
566 L / 20.0 cu-ft ~ 2750 L / 97.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
106.0 L / 28.0 gal
107.0 L / 28.3 gal
106.0 L / 28.0 gal
Passengers
8
8

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Multi-link, Solid axle
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
265/70 R17
265/70 R18

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
250 mm / 9.8 in
Size | Height
1971 mm / 77.6 in
1941 mm / 76.4 in
1913 mm / 75.3 in
Size | Length
5228 mm / 205.8 in
5636 mm / 221.9 in
5255 mm / 206.9 in
Size | Width
2000 mm / 78.7 in
2029 mm / 79.9 in | 2372 mm / 93.4 in (mirror unfolded) | 2123 mm / 83.6 in (mirror folded)
2002 mm / 78.8 in
Track Width | Front
1702.0 mm / 67.0 in
1717.0 mm / 67.6 in
1715.0 mm / 67.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1709.0 mm / 67.3 in
1707.0 mm / 67.2 in
1715.0 mm / 67.5 in
Wheel Size
18 in
Wheelbase
3023 mm / 119.0 in
3343 mm / 131.6 in
3130 mm / 123.2 in

Performance

Top Speed
185.0 km/h / 115.0 mph

Powertrain

Engine | Bore
98.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
9.8:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
5.6 L / 338.8 cu-in / 5552.0 cc
Engine | Power
375.0 hp / 279.6 kW @ 5000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
107.3 hp/L / 1.8 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
637 Nm / 469.8 lb-ft @ 2250 rpm
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
10-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic SelectShift
Automatic

Production

Availability
2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
58%
86%
60%
Pros
  • Stout drivetrain
  • Considerable offroad capabilities
  • Lots of space inside
  • Great styling
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Decent reliability
  • High cargo capacity
  • Very imposing exterior
Cons
  • Poor fuel economy
  • Sluggish acceleration
  • Poor handling
  • Bland styling
  • Limited to V6
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Poor handling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.