Compare Ford Expedition 2 vs Chevrolet Suburban 10 vs Ford Excursion
Variants
4.6
4.6 4WD
5.4 263 4WD
5.4 263
5.4 304
5.4 304 4WD
5.3 310
5.3 310 AWD
5.3 FlexFuel
5.3 FlexFuel AWD
5.3
5.3 AWD
6.0 352
6.0 352 AWD
6.0 366
6.0 359
6.0 359 AWD
5.4 258 4WD
5.4 263 4WD
5.4 263
5.4 258
6.0 TD 4WD
6.0 TD
6.8 314 4WD
6.8 314
7.3 TD 4WD
7.3 TD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
571 L / 20.2 cu-ft ~ 1723 L / 60.8 cu-ft
1297 L / 45.8 cu-ft ~ 3890 L / 137.4 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
106.0 L / 28.0 gal
Passengers
8
9
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Solid axle
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Tire Size
265/70 R17
265/75 R16
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Size | Height
1971 mm / 77.6 in
1951 mm / 76.8 in
Size | Length
5228 mm / 205.8 in
5648 mm / 222.4 in
5758 mm / 226.7 in
Size | Width
2000 mm / 78.7 in
2010 mm / 79.1 in
2032 mm / 80.0 in
Track Width | Front
1702.0 mm / 67.0 in
1732.0 mm / 68.2 in
1737.0 mm / 68.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1709.0 mm / 67.3 in
1702.0 mm / 67.0 in
1730.0 mm / 68.1 in
Wheelbase
3023 mm / 119.0 in
3302 mm / 130.0 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
11.0 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
10.5 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.45
Top Speed
153.0 km/h / 95.1 mph
Powertrain
Engine | Redline
6000 rpm
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 engine with 2 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
58%
83%
75%
Pros
- Stout drivetrain
- Considerable offroad capabilities
- Lots of space inside
- Superb offroad capabilities
- Very high cargo capacity
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Exceptionally stout powertrain
- True heavy duty SUV
- Very high cargo capacity
Cons
- Poor fuel economy
- Sluggish acceleration
- Poor handling
- Bland styling
- High 0.45 drag coefficient
- High fuel consumption
- Large turning circle
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Poor ride quality
- Difficult to drive in traffic
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.