Compare Ford Kuga 2 vs Chevrolet Blazer vs Chevrolet Captiva

Ford Kuga 2 / Escape 3 (C520) Crossover (2012-2019)

Chevrolet Captiva / Holden Captiva Crossover (2006-2018)

Ford | Cars

Chevrolet | Cars

Variants

1.5 120

1.5 150

1.5 182 4x4 AT

1.5 TDCI 120

1.5 TDCI 120 AT

1.6 150

1.6 150 4x4 AT

1.6 182 4x4 AT

2.0 242 4x4 AT

2.0 TDCi 140

2.0 TDCi 140 4x4

2.0 TDCi 140 4x4 AT

2.0 TDCI 150

2.0 TDCI 150 4x4

2.0 TDCI 150 4x4 AT

2.0 TDCi 163 4x4

2.0 TDCi 163 4x4 AT

2.0 TDCI 180 4x4

2.0 TDCI 180 4x4 AT

2.0T

2.5

3.6

3.6 AWD

2.0 VCDi 127

2.0 VCDi 127 AWD

2.0 VCDi 150

2.0 VCDi 150 AWD

2.0 VCDi 150 AWD AT

2.2 VCDi 163

2.2 VCDi 163 AT

2.2 VCDi 163 AWD

2.2 VCDi 184 AT

2.2 VCDi 184 AWD

2.2 VCDi 184 AWD AT

2.4

2.4 AWD

2.4 AWD AT

2.4 Ecotec 167

2.4 Ecotec 167 AT

2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD

2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD AT

3.0 AWD AT

3.2 AWD AT

Sport 2.4 AT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

Passengers

5 / 7

Payload

944 kg / 2081 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

18.2 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

22.7 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Turning Circle

11.1 m / 36.4 ft

11.8 m / 38.7 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door SUV

5-door Crossover

5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

188 mm / 7.4 in

Wheelbase

2690 mm / 105.9 in

2863 mm / 112.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.38

Top Speed

210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph

Towing Capacity

680 kg / 1499 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Emission Standard

China VI B

Engine | Displacement

2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc

Transmission | Gears

6-speed

9-speed

Transmission | Type

Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score

19%

33%

45%

Pros

Decent drivetrain reliability

Good exterior styling
High cargo capacity

Reasonable drivetrain reliability
Good towing capacity

Cons

Uglier than the original
Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Poor performance
Mediocre build quality
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Very ugly
Bad 0-100kph time
High 0.38 drag coefficient
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.