Compare Chevrolet Tahoe 3 vs Jeep Wrangler JL
Variants
4.8
5.3 4AT
5.3 AWD 4AT
5.3 AWD 6AT
5.3 FlexFuel
5.3 FlexFuel AWD
6.0 Hybrid AWD CVT
6.0 Hybrid CVT
6.2 AWD
2.0 Rubicon
2.0 Sahara
2.0 Sport
2.2 Rubicon
2.2 Sahara
3.6 Rubicon
3.6 Rubicon MT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
9.4 L / 9.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Passengers
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
17.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
21.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone, Solid axle
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Multi-link, Solid axle
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
Water Fording
760 mm / 29.9 in
Dimensions
Size | Width
2007 mm / 79.0 in
Track Width | Front
1732.0 mm / 68.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1702.0 mm / 67.0 in
Wheelbase
2946 mm / 116.0 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
195 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Reviews
Neofiliac score
79%
72%
Pros
- Superb offroad capabilities
- Very high cargo capacity
- Superb offroad capabilities
- Small turning circle
- High cargo capacity
Cons
- Some fit and finish problems
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.