Compare Hyundai Santa Fe 3 vs Chevrolet Equinox vs Chevrolet Equinox 3
Variants
2.0 CRDi 150
2.0 CRDi 150 AWD
2.2 CRDi 197
2.2 CRDi 197 AWD
2.2 CRDi 197 AWD AT
2.2 CRDi 200
2.2 CRDi 200 AWD
2.2 CRDi 200 AWD AT
2.2 CRDi 200 AT
2.4 GDI 188
2.4 GDI 188 AT
2.4 GDI 192
2.4 GDI 192 AWD
2.4 GDI 192 AT
2.4 MPI
2.4 MPI AWD
2.4 MPI AWD AT
3.3 MPi AWD AT
Sport 2.0 Turbo GDI AT
Sport 2.0 Turbo GDI AWD AT
FWD
AWD
1.5
1.5 AWD
1.5
1.6d
1.6d AWD
2.0
2.0 AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
860 L / 30.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
9.9 L / 10.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.8 L / 5.1 qt
3.8 L / 4.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
63.0 L / 16.6 gal
Passengers
5 / 7
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
16.5 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
16.6 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
21.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link, Transverse stabilizer
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/65 R16
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Size | Height
1705 mm / 67.1 in
Size | Length
4795 mm / 188.8 in
Size | Width
1835 mm / 72.2 in
Track Width | Front
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2860 mm / 112.6 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.0 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.6 sec
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
42.4 m / 139.1 ft
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Engine
LNJ
Engine | Bore
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.4 L / 204.4 cu-in / 3350.0 cc
Engine | Power
185.0 hp / 138.0 kW @ 5200 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
55.2 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
285 Nm / 210.2 lb-ft @ 3800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 engine with 2 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic Hydra-Matic
Production
Availability
2005 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
55%
18%
19%
Pros
- Improved exterior design
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Some offroad capabilities
- Good towing capacity
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Cheap to purchase
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Very ugly indeed
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.