Compare Hyundai Kona vs Chevrolet Trax vs Chevrolet Equinox 3
Variants
1.0 T-GDi
1.6 CRDi 116
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 GDi 141 Hybrid DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 AWD DCT
2.0 150 AT
2.0 150 AWD AT
39 kWh Electric
39.2 kWh Electric
64 kWh (204 Hp) Electric
1.4 AT
1.4 AWD AT
1.4 Turbo AWD
1.6
1.7D
1.7D AT
1.7D AWD
1.5
1.5 AWD
1.5
1.6d
1.6d AWD
2.0
2.0 AWD
Capacity
Engine Oil Capacity
4.4 L / 4.6 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
504 kg / 1111 lbs
Chassis
Offroad | Approach Angle
15.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/70 R16
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
157 mm / 6.2 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2555 mm / 100.6 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
Kappa
Transmission | Type
Automatic Hydra-Matic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
23%
19%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Cheap to purchase
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Independent rear suspensions only for AWD model
- Somewhat ugly
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Basic suspension setup
- Ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.