Compare Hyundai Kona vs Mercedes EQA H243 vs Mercedes GLA-Class X156 facelift
Variants
1.0 T-GDi
1.6 CRDi 116
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 GDi 141 Hybrid DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 AWD DCT
2.0 150 AT
2.0 150 AWD AT
39 kWh Electric
39.2 kWh Electric
64 kWh (204 Hp) Electric
EQA 250
EQA 300 4MATIC
EQA 350 4MATIC+
GLA 180
GLA 180 DCT
GLA 180d
GLA 180d DCT
GLA 200
GLA 200 DCT
GLA 200d
GLA 200d 4MATIC DCT
GLA 200d DCT
GLA 220 4MATIC DCT
GLA 220 DCT
GLA 220d 4MATIC DCT
GLA 220d DCT
GLA 250
GLA 250 4MATIC DCT
GLA 250 DCT
GLA 45 AMG 4MATIC DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
340 L / 12.0 cu-ft ~ 1320 L / 46.6 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.4 L / 4.6 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
505 kg / 1113 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
15.7 deg
18.7 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
14.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
21.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
11.8 m / 38.8 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
420.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
154 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1494 mm / 58.8 in
Size | Length
4463 mm / 175.7 in
4424 mm / 174.2 in
Size | Width
1834 mm / 72.2 in | 2020 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1804 mm / 71.0 in | 2022 mm / 79.6 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1569.0 mm / 61.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Top Speed
160.0 km/h / 99.4 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine
Kappa
Engine | Power
190 hp / 141.7 kW
Engine | Type
Asynchronous motor (ASM)
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2021
Debut
2020-01
Made In
Germany
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
26%
36%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Up to 426km electric range
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Independent rear suspensions only for AWD model
- Bland and ugly
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Falsely sold as SUV
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.