Compare Honda Pilot vs Chevrolet Blazer vs Chevrolet Captiva
Variants
3.5 243 AWD
3.5 248
3.5 248 AWD
3.5 258 AWD
2.0T
2.5
3.6
3.6 AWD
2.0 VCDi 127
2.0 VCDi 127 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD AT
2.2 VCDi 163
2.2 VCDi 163 AT
2.2 VCDi 163 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AT
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD AT
2.4
2.4 AWD
2.4 AWD AT
2.4 Ecotec 167
2.4 Ecotec 167 AT
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD AT
3.0 AWD AT
3.2 AWD AT
Sport 2.4 AT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
9.1 L / 9.6 qt
Passengers
8
5 / 7
Payload
944 kg / 2081 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 300 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 312 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
22.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/70 R16
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
188 mm / 7.4 in
Size | Length
4775 mm / 188.0 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2863 mm / 112.7 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
8.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.8 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Towing Capacity
680 kg / 1499 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
ULEV-2
China VI B
Engine
J35A6
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 211.8 cu-in / 3471.0 cc
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
9-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
33%
45%
Pros
- Reliable engine
- Some offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Good exterior styling
- High cargo capacity
- Reasonable drivetrain reliability
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Boring design
- Poor performance
- Mediocre build quality
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very ugly
- Bad 0-100kph time
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.