Compare Honda CR-V 5 vs Nissan Qashqai 2 vs Nissan Rogue

Nissan Qashqai 2 (J11) Crossover (2013-2020)

Nissan Rogue (S35) Crossover (2007-2013)

Honda | Cars

Nissan | Cars

Variants

1.5 173

1.5 173 AWD

1.5 190 AWD CVT

1.5 190 CVT

1.5 193 AWD CVT

1.6d 120 AT

1.6d 120 AWD AT

1.6d 160 AWD

1.6d 160 AWD AT

2.0 AWD CVT

2.0 CVT

2.0 Hybrid

2.0 Hybrid AWD

2.0 Hybrid Euro6d

2.0 Hybrid Euro6d AWD

2.4 AWD CVT

2.4 CVT

1.2

1.2 Euro6

1.2 CVT

1.2 Euro6 CVT

1.3 140

1.3 160

1.3 160 DCT

1.5 dCi 110 Euro6

1.5 dCi 110

1.5 dCi 115

1.5 dCi 115 DCT

1.6 dCi

1.6 dCi Euro6

1.6 dCi AWD

1.6 dCi Euro6 AWD

1.6 dCi CVT

1.6 dCi Euro6 CVT

1.6

1.7 dCi

1.7 dCi AWD

1.7 dCi AWD CVT

AWD

AWD 2011+

FWD

FWD 2011+

Capacity

Fuel Capacity

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Ventilated discs

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Multi-link

Tire Size

215/70 R16, 225/60 R17, 225/55 R18

Turning Circle

10.7 m / 35.2 ft

11.4 m / 37.4 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

211 mm / 8.3 in

Size | Width

1801 mm / 70.9 in

Track Width | Front

1539.0 mm / 60.6 in

Track Width | Rear

1560.0 mm / 61.4 in

1549.0 mm / 61.0 in

Wheel Size

6.5J x 16, 7.0J x 17, 7.0J x 18

Wheelbase

2646 mm / 104.2 in

2690 mm / 105.9 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h

9.8 sec

Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph

9.3 sec

Coefficient Of Drag

0.33

Top Speed

200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph

Powertrain

Engine

QR25DE

Engine | Bore

89.0 mm / 3.5 in

Engine | Displacement

2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc

Engine | Specific Output

68.3 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in

Engine | Stroke

100.0 mm / 3.9 in

Engine | Torque

237 Nm / 174.8 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm

Engine | Type

Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Transmission | Type

CVT

Reviews

Neofiliac score

41%

14%

25%

Pros

High cargo capacity
Good towing capacity
Good engine reliability

Low official fuel consumption
Not very ugly

Better appointed than the Qashqai

Cons

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Horrible CVT

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Unreliable engines and CVT
No independent rear suspensions

Horrible 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
High 0.36 drag coefficient

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.