Compare Honda CR-V 5 vs Nissan Juke vs Nissan Rogue

Nissan Rogue (S35) Crossover (2007-2013)

Honda | Cars

Nissan | Cars

Variants

1.5 173

1.5 173 AWD

1.5 190 AWD CVT

1.5 190 CVT

1.5 193 AWD CVT

1.6d 120 AT

1.6d 120 AWD AT

1.6d 160 AWD

1.6d 160 AWD AT

2.0 AWD CVT

2.0 CVT

2.0 Hybrid

2.0 Hybrid AWD

2.0 Hybrid Euro6d

2.0 Hybrid Euro6d AWD

2.4 AWD CVT

2.4 CVT

1.2 DIG-T

1.5 dCi

1.5 dCi Euro6

1.5 dCi Euro6d

1.6 113PS Euro6d

1.6 113PS Euro6d CVT

1.6 117PS

1.6 117PS CVT

1.6 94PS Euro6

1.6 94PS

1.6 DIG-T

1.6 DIG-T CVT

1.6 DIG-T AWD CVT

Nismo

Nismo AWD CVT

Nismo RS AWD CVT

Nismo RS

AWD

AWD 2011+

FWD

FWD 2011+

Capacity

Fuel Capacity

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Ventilated discs

Offroad | Approach Angle

22.0 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

25.0 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Multi-link

Tire Size

215/70 R16, 225/60 R17, 225/55 R18

Turning Circle

10.7 m / 35.1 ft

11.4 m / 37.4 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

211 mm / 8.3 in

Size | Width

1801 mm / 70.9 in

Track Width | Front

1539.0 mm / 60.6 in

Track Width | Rear

1549.0 mm / 61.0 in

Wheel Size

6.5J x 16, 7.0J x 17, 7.0J x 18

Wheelbase

2530 mm / 99.6 in

2690 mm / 105.9 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h

9.8 sec

Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph

9.3 sec

Coefficient Of Drag

0.35

Top Speed

200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph

Powertrain

Engine

QR25DE

Engine | Bore

89.0 mm / 3.5 in

Engine | Displacement

2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc

Engine | Specific Output

68.3 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in

Engine | Stroke

100.0 mm / 3.9 in

Engine | Torque

237 Nm / 174.8 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm

Engine | Type

Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Transmission | Type

CVT

Reviews

Neofiliac score

41%

25%

Pros

High cargo capacity
Good towing capacity
Good engine reliability

So ugly it's endearing

Better appointed than the Qashqai

Cons

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Horrible CVT

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions
Horrible Renault engines
Bad CVT

Horrible 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
High 0.36 drag coefficient

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.