Compare Honda CR-V 5 vs Subaru Forester 2 vs Honda Pilot 2

Variants
1.5 173
1.5 173 AWD
1.5 190 AWD CVT
1.5 190 CVT
1.5 193 AWD CVT
1.6d 120 AT
1.6d 120 AWD AT
1.6d 160 AWD
1.6d 160 AWD AT
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 Hybrid AWD
2.0 Hybrid Euro6d
2.0 Hybrid Euro6d AWD
2.4 AWD CVT
2.4 CVT
2.0X
2.0X AT
2.0XT
2.0XT AT
2.5 158PS
2.5 158PS AT
2.5 165PS
2.5 165PS AT
2.5 173PS
2.5 173PS AT
2.5T
AWD
FWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
406 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1525 L / 53.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
79.0 L / 20.9 gal
Passengers
5
8
Payload
545 kg / 1202 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 330 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 333 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link

Construction

Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
203 mm / 8.0 in
Size | Length
4450 mm / 175.2 in
Size | Width
1735 mm / 68.3 in
1994 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Front
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
1715.0 mm / 67.5 in
Wheelbase
2525 mm / 99.4 in
2774 mm / 109.2 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ULEV-2
Engine
J35Z4
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 211.8 cu-in / 3471.0 cc
Engine | Power
253.0 hp / 188.7 kW @ 5700 rpm
Engine | Redline
6300 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
72.9 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
93.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
343 Nm / 253.0 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2008 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
41%
34%
34%
Pros
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good engine reliability
  • Characteristic H4 engiens
  • Symmetric AWD
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • High engine reliability
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible CVT
  • No powerful engine options
  • MacPherson front suspensions
  • Quite ugly
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.