Compare Audi Q7 II vs Ford Escape vs Ford Flex

Variants
2.0 TFSI
3.0 TDI 249
3.0 TDI 272
3.0 TFSI
3.0 ultra TDI 218
45 TDI MHEV
50 TDI MHEV
e-tron 3.0 TDI
2.0
2.0 AWD
2.3 Hybrid
2.3 Hybrid AWD
2.3
2.3 AWD
2.3 AWD AT
2.3 AT
3.0
3.0 AWD
3.5 262
3.5 262 AWD
3.5 286
3.5 286 AWD
3.5 355 AWD
3.5 364 AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
934 L / 33.0 cu-ft ~ 1835 L / 64.8 cu-ft
566 L / 20.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
71.0 L / 18.8 gal
Passengers
5 / 7
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Drum
Disc
Offroad | Breakover Angle
13.1 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
31.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.3 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
210 mm / 8.3 in
150 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1702 mm / 67.0 in
1727 mm / 68.0 in
Size | Length
4394 mm / 173.0 in
5130 mm / 202.0 in
Size | Width
1968 mm / 77.5 in | 2212 mm / 87.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1780 mm / 70.1 in
Track Width | Front
1679.0 mm / 66.1 in
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
1661.0 mm / 65.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1691.0 mm / 66.6 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1661.0 mm / 65.4 in
Weight
2105.0 kg / 4640.7 lbs
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2994 mm / 117.9 in
2619 mm / 103.1 in
2995 mm / 117.9 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
8.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.4 sec
Electric Range
56.0 km / 34.8 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
74%
17%
81%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Superb exterior design
  • Great interior finish
  • Lots of room inside
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • No more 8+ cylinder models
  • Somewhat generic styling
  • Quite ugly
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No real capabilities
  • Does not perform well

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.