Compare Audi Q7 II vs Volvo XC60 II vs Jaguar E-Pace facelift

Variants
2.0 TFSI
3.0 TDI 249
3.0 TDI 272
3.0 TFSI
3.0 ultra TDI 218
45 TDI MHEV
50 TDI MHEV
e-tron 3.0 TDI
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
P160
P300e AWD
D165 MT
D165 AWD
D200 AWD
P200 AWD
P250 AWD
P300 AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
601 L / 21.2 cu-ft ~ 1386 L / 48.9 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Passengers
5 / 7
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
21.0 deg
22.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
13.1 deg
19.0 deg
20.7 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
31.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
23.0 deg
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.6 m / 38.1 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
500 mm / 19.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.3 kWh (gross)
18.8 kWh (gross)
15.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
210 mm / 8.3 in
216 mm / 8.5 in
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1658 mm / 65.3 in
1648 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4395 mm / 173.0 in
Size | Width
1968 mm / 77.5 in | 2212 mm / 87.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1679.0 mm / 66.1 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1691.0 mm / 66.6 in
1624.0 mm / 63.9 in
Wheelbase
2994 mm / 117.9 in
2865 mm / 112.8 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Electric Range
56.0 km / 34.8 mi
18.6 km / 11.6 mi
55.0 km / 34.2 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Geartronic

Production

Availability
2017
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
74%
57%
35%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • No more 8+ cylinder models
  • Somewhat generic styling
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low build quality

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.