Compare Audi Q7 II (4M) vs Volvo XC60 II (SPA) vs Peugeot 3008 II

Audi Q7 II (4M)

Volvo XC60 II (SPA)

Peugeot 3008 II

Audi Q7 II (4M)Volvo XC60 II (SPA)Peugeot 3008 II
Variants
2.0 TFSI
3.0 TDI 249
3.0 TDI 272
3.0 TFSI
3.0 ultra TDI 218
45 TDI MHEV
50 TDI MHEV
e-tron 3.0 TDI
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
1.2 130 AT
1.2 130
1.5 HDi 130 AT
1.5 HDi 130
1.6 HDi 100
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 180 AT
1.6 PHEV
1.6 THP 165 AT
2.0 HDi 150
GT 2.0 HDi 177
GT 2.0 HDi 180

Reviews

Neofiliac score74%57%21%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • No more 8+ cylinder models
  • Somewhat generic styling
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.