Compare Acura RDX 3 vs Acura MDX 2 vs Acura MDX
Variants
3.5 228
3.5 243
3.5 256
3.5 263
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
835 L / 29.5 cu-ft
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft ~ 2308 L / 81.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.4 L / 5.7 qt
9.2 L / 9.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.8 L / 5.1 qt
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
79.5 L / 21.0 gal
73.0 L / 19.3 gal
Passengers
5
7
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
255/45 R20
P255/55 R18
235/65 R17
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Size | Height
1669 mm / 65.7 in
1732 mm / 68.2 in
Size | Length
4747 mm / 186.9 in
4844 mm / 190.7 in
Size | Width
1880 mm / 74.0 in
1994 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Front
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
1685.0 mm / 66.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1715.0 mm / 67.5 in
1690.0 mm / 66.5 in
Wheel Size
20 in
Wheelbase
2751 mm / 108.3 in
2751 mm / 108.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.0 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.6 sec
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Engine
K20C4
J37A1
Engine | Bore
90.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 122.0 cu-in / 2000.0 cc
3.7 L / 223.6 cu-in / 3664.0 cc
Engine | Power
272.0 hp / 202.8 kW @ 6500 rpm
304.0 hp / 226.7 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
136.0 hp/L / 2.2 hp/cu-in
83.0 hp/L / 1.4 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Torque
380 Nm / 280.3 lb-ft @ 1600-4500 rpm
275 Nm / 202.8 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
10-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic SportShift
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2019
2007 ~ 2013
Reviews
Neofiliac score
45%
50%
39%
Pros
- Comfortable
- Good engine reliability
- Much improved styling
- Good drivetrain reliability
- High cargo capacity
Cons
- Questionable drivetrain longevity
- Gaping front grille
- Questionable automatic transmission
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.