Compare Acura RDX 3 vs Skoda Kodiaq vs Acura RDX
Variants
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 150 4x4
1.4 TSI 150 4x4 DSG
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 4x4 DSG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 150 4x4
2.0 TDI 150 4x4 DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 177 4x4 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 4x4 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 4x4 DSG
2.0 TSI 180 4x4 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 4x4 DSG
GT 186 AT
GT 220 4x4 DSG
RS 4x4 DSG
2.3
2.3 AWD pre-facelift
2.3 AWD facelift
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
835 L / 29.5 cu-ft
787 L / 27.8 cu-ft ~ 1716 L / 60.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.4 L / 5.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.8 L / 5.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5 / 7
5
Payload
642 kg / 1415 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
255/45 R20
235/55 R18
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Size | Height
1669 mm / 65.7 in
Size | Length
4747 mm / 186.9 in
Size | Width
1880 mm / 74.0 in
Track Width | Front
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1590.0 mm / 62.6 in
Wheel Size
20 in
Wheelbase
2751 mm / 108.3 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
Performance
Top Speed
195.0 km/h / 121.2 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Engine
K20C4
K23A1
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
8.8:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 122.0 cu-in / 2000.0 cc
2.3 L / 140.4 cu-in / 2300.0 cc
Engine | Power
272.0 hp / 202.8 kW @ 6500 rpm
240.0 hp / 179.0 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
136.0 hp/L / 2.2 hp/cu-in
104.3 hp/L / 1.7 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
99.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Torque
380 Nm / 280.3 lb-ft @ 1600-4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Turbocharged multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
10-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic SportShift
Automatic
Production
Availability
2019
Reviews
Neofiliac score
45%
42%
42%
Pros
- Comfortable
- High cargo capacity
- Good drivetrain reliability
Cons
- Questionable drivetrain longevity
- Gaping front grille
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.