Compare Renault Koleos 2 vs Renault Kadjar vs Renault Koleos
Variants
1.6 dCi
1.6 dCi CVT
2.0 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi 4x4
2.0 dCi 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi CVT
2.5 4x4 CVT
1.2 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 130 AWD
2.0 dCi 150
2.0 dCi 150 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 173 4x4
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 175 Euro5 4x4
2.5 170
2.5 170 4x4
2.5 170 4x4 CVT
2.5 170 CVT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
409 L / 14.4 cu-ft ~ 1478 L / 52.2 cu-ft
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft ~ 1380 L / 48.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
10.7 m / 35.2 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
210 mm / 8.3 in
200 mm / 7.9 in
Size | Height
1673 mm / 65.9 in
1607 mm / 63.3 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Size | Length
4449 mm / 175.2 in
4520 mm / 178.0 in
Size | Width
1843 mm / 72.6 in | 2063 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1864 mm / 73.4 in (mirror folded)
1836 mm / 72.3 in | 2058 mm / 81.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1591.0 mm / 62.6 in
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2705 mm / 106.5 in
2646 mm / 104.2 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.353
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
80.0 mm / 3.1 in
Engine | Stroke
79.5 mm / 3.1 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
6-speed
Production
Availability
2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
28%
4%
23%
Pros
- Coherent exterior design
- Good towing capacity
- Basic offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Relatively adequate engines
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- CMiserably low engine output
- Poor build quality
- Horrible styling
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.