Compare Toyota Wish 2 vs Toyota Sienna 4 vs Chevrolet Uplander
Variants
1.8 131 4WD
1.8 133 4WD
1.8 143
1.8i 144
2.0 152
2.0 158
2.5 Hybrid AWD
2.5 Hybrid
3.5 AWD
3.5 FWD
3.9
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
949 L / 33.5 cu-ft ~ 2860 L / 101.0 cu-ft
762 L / 26.9 cu-ft ~ 3865 L / 136.5 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.5 L / 4.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
95.0 L / 25.1 gal
Passengers
7
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 327.66 mm
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 317.5 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
225/60 R17
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.9 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door hybrid Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
150 mm / 5.9 in
160 mm / 6.3 in
Size | Height
1740 mm / 68.5 in
1830 mm / 72.0 in
Size | Length
5169 mm / 203.5 in
Size | Width
1994 mm / 78.5 in
1830 mm / 72.0 in
Track Width | Front
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1740.0 mm / 68.5 in
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
Weight
2091.0 kg / 4609.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
3061 mm / 120.5 in
3077 mm / 121.1 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Top Speed
175.0 km/h / 108.7 mph
Towing Capacity
1588 kg / 3501 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
SULEV
Engine
A25A-FXS
Engine | Bore
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
87.4 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
14.0:1
9.8:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2487.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
76.0 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
103.4 mm / 4.1 in
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
CVT
e-CVT
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
33%
55%
26%
Pros
- Small turning circle
- Coherent styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- High cargo capacity
- Good styling
- High reliability
- Very high cargo capacity
- Lots of space inside
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspension
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.