Compare Toyota Sienna 3 vs Toyota Ractis 2 vs Mercedes B-Class W246
Variants
2.7
3.5
3.5 AWD
1.33
1.33 CVT
1.4 D-4D
1.4 D-4D CVT
B 160 CDI
B 160 CDI DCT
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180 CDI (OM651)
B 180 CDI (OM651) DCT
B 180 CDI (OM607)
B 180 CDI (OM607) DCT
B 200
B 200 DCT
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI DCT
B 250 DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
993 L / 35.1 cu-ft ~ 3810 L / 134.5 cu-ft
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1547 L / 54.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Trailing arm
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1595 mm / 62.8 in
1557 mm / 61.3 in
Size | Length
5085 mm / 200.2 in
3990 mm / 157.1 in
4359 mm / 171.6 in
Size | Width
1984 mm / 78.1 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheelbase
3030 mm / 119.3 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
1588 kg / 3501 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
550 kg / 1213 lbs (w/o brakes) | 800 kg / 1764 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
695 kg / 1532 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1400 kg / 3086 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
73.7 mm / 2.9 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ECT-i
Production
Availability
2010 ~ 2017
2010 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
78%
19%
24%
Pros
- Very high cargo capacity
- Superb exterior styling
- Good interiors
- Cool sliding doors with hidden hinge
- Good 0.29 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Improved exterior design
- Low official fuel consumption
- Less ugly than before
Cons
- None
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- CVT
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- Poor fit and finish
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.