Compare Renault Grand Espace 4 vs Renault Modus vs Mercedes B-Class W246
Variants
1.9 dCi
2.0 dCi 130
2.0 dCi 131
2.0 dCi 150
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 AT
2.0 dCi 150 AT
2.0 dCi 173
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5
2.0 dCi 173 AT
2.0 dCi 173 AT
2.0 TCe 170
2.0 TCe 170 Euro5
2.0 TCe 170 AT
2.0 Turbo 163
2.0 Turbo 163 AT
2.0 Turbo 170
2.0 Turbo 170 AT
2.2 dCi 139 AT
2.2 dCi 150
2.2 dCi 150 AT
3.0 dCi 177 AT
3.0 dCi 181 AT
3.5 AT
3.5 Euro3 AT
1.2 TCe
1.2
1.4
1.5 dCi 103
1.5 dCi 106
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86
1.6 112
1.6 112 AT
1.6 88
B 160 CDI
B 160 CDI DCT
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180 CDI (OM651)
B 180 CDI (OM651) DCT
B 180 CDI (OM607)
B 180 CDI (OM607) DCT
B 200
B 200 DCT
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI DCT
B 250 DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
456 L / 16.1 cu-ft ~ 3050 L / 107.7 cu-ft
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1547 L / 54.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
83.0 L / 21.9 gal
49.0 L / 12.9 gal
Passengers
7
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Trailing arm
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1589 mm / 62.6 in
1557 mm / 61.3 in
Size | Length
4359 mm / 171.6 in
Track Width | Front
1574.0 mm / 62.0 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheelbase
2482 mm / 97.7 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
695 kg / 1532 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1400 kg / 3086 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
73.7 mm / 2.9 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
31%
6%
24%
Pros
- Very high cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Lots of space inside
- Small turning circle
- Low fuel consumption
- Low official fuel consumption
- Less ugly than before
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Rather bad design
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- Poor fit and finish
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.