Compare Ford S-MAX vs Ford Grand C-MAX
Variants
1.6
1.6 TDCi 115
1.8 TDCi 100
1.8 TDCi 125
2.0
2.0 145
2.0 203
2.0 203 AT
2.0 240
2.0 240 AT
2.0 TDCi 130
2.0 TDCi 140
2.0 TDCi 140
2.0 TDCi 140 AT
2.0 TDCi 140 AT
2.0 TDCi 163
2.0 TDCi 163 AT
2.2 TDCi 175
2.2 TDCi 200
2.2 TDCi 200 AT
2.3
2.3 AT
2.5
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 100 Euro6
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 182 AT
1.5 TDCi 120
1.5 TDCi 120 AT
1.5 TDCi 95
1.6 TDCi 115
1.6 Ti-VCT 120
2.0 TDCi 150
2.0 TDCi 150 AT
2.0 TDCi 170 AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
7
5 / 7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16
205/55 R16, 215/55 R16, 215/50 R17, 235/40 R18
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Track Width | Front
1589.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
41%
24%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Fully independent suspension setup
- Decent engine reliability
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Poor performance
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.