Compare Mazda 5 vs Ford S-MAX
Variants
1.8
2.0
2.0D 110
2.0D 143
1.6
1.6 TDCi 115
1.8 TDCi 100
1.8 TDCi 125
2.0
2.0 145
2.0 203
2.0 203 AT
2.0 240
2.0 240 AT
2.0 TDCi 130
2.0 TDCi 140
2.0 TDCi 140
2.0 TDCi 140 AT
2.0 TDCi 140 AT
2.0 TDCi 163
2.0 TDCi 163 AT
2.2 TDCi 175
2.2 TDCi 200
2.2 TDCi 200 AT
2.3
2.3 AT
2.5
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
7
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Length
4505 mm / 177.4 in
Size | Width
1755 mm / 69.1 in
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1589.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2005 ~ 2008
Reviews
Neofiliac score
37%
41%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good interior seating / cargo space
- High cargo capacity
- Fully independent suspension setup
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No powerful engine options
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.