Compare Mazda 5 vs Ford Galaxy 2
Variants
1.8
2.0
2.0D 110
2.0D 143
1.8 TDCi 101
1.8 TDCi 125
2.0 AT
2.0
2.0 TDCi 130
2.0 TDCi 140
2.2 TDCi 175
2.3
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
308 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 2325 L / 82.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
7
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1723 mm / 67.8 in
Size | Length
4505 mm / 177.4 in
4820 mm / 189.8 in
Size | Width
1755 mm / 69.1 in
1854 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1589.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 4
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2005 ~ 2008
Reviews
Neofiliac score
37%
47%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good interior seating / cargo space
- High cargo capacity
- Good automatic transmission
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.