Compare Mercedes B-Class W245 vs Skoda Roomster vs Mercedes B-Class W246
Variants
B 150
B 150 CVT
B 170
B 170 CVT
B 180 CDI
B 180 CDI CVT
B 200
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI CVT
B 200 Turbo
B 200 Turbo CVT
1.2 64
1.2 70
1.2 TDI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 AT
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 86 Euro5
1.4 86
1.4 TDI 70
1.4 TDI 80
1.6 105
1.6 105 AT
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.9 TDI 103
B 160 CDI
B 160 CDI DCT
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180 CDI (OM651)
B 180 CDI (OM651) DCT
B 180 CDI (OM607)
B 180 CDI (OM607) DCT
B 200
B 200 DCT
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI DCT
B 250 DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
544 L / 19.2 cu-ft ~ 2245 L / 79.3 cu-ft
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft ~ 1780 L / 62.9 cu-ft
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1547 L / 54.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
54.0 L / 14.3 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 258x8 mm
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsino beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Trailing arm
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.2 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1607 mm / 63.3 in
1557 mm / 61.3 in
Size | Length
4270 mm / 168.1 in
4359 mm / 171.6 in
Size | Width
1777 mm / 70.0 in | 1975 mm / 77.8 in (mirror unfolded)
1684 mm / 66.3 in
Track Width | Front
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheelbase
2778 mm / 109.4 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
695 kg / 1532 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1400 kg / 3086 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
73.7 mm / 2.9 in
Production
Availability
2005 ~ 2008
Reviews
Neofiliac score
14%
17%
24%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Lots of usable space inside for such a small car
- Low official fuel consumption
- Less ugly than before
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poor drivetrain reliability
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- Poor fit and finish
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.